Alfred von Oppenheim Center for the Future of Europe

At the Alfred von Oppenheim Center for the Future of Europe (AOZ), a small group of researchers from across Europe provide their perspectives on decision-making by the German government. The aim is twofold: to avoid misperceptions between Germany and its partners at a time of power shifts in Europe and geopolitical realignment and to help Germany help Europe to build a brighter future.

Main Topics:

  • Internationalizing the Zeitenwende, Germany’s shift in defense, energy, economic, and foreign policy in response to Russia’s war on Ukraine
  • Rethinking Franco-German efforts to reform the EU taking account of power shifts in Wider Europe
  • Analyzing European choices about defense, security, and foreign policy in light of political developments in the United States
  • Highlighting different ways for Europeans to do grand strategy and geopolitics – and to better combine values with interests
Read more

We provide an outside perspective on German decision-making and tackle misperceptions between Germany and its partners at a time of power shifts in Europe and of geopolitical realignment. By looking at German policies and policy-making from different angles, focusing on the country’s key relationships and factoring in the concerns of its neighbors and partners, we help Germany to play a positive role in constructing the future European order – and to help Europe build a brighter future.

In thinking about the future, we combine our expertise on the historical development of European alliances, institutions, and policies with methods of strategic foresight. And in thinking about European order, we look beyond the EU to include other European and transatlantic partnerships and institutions.

Applications for Our Research

Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and the EU’s strategic failures in fields such as defense, energy, and economic security have put the spotlight on German decision-making. Long Europe’s main status quo power, Germany now stands accused of a basic failure to listen to its neighbors. The country is under pressure to adapt its thinking to current geopolitical challenges and better calculate – or at least better articulate – its own interests.

We aim to help Germany become a good citizen of Europe, a “team power,” but how do we do so when the pressures Germany faces seem so contradictory? Germany needs to change its foreign policy significantly but also remain credible and predictable as a partner. It needs to assert itself in a new world order but also to build consensus with its neighbors.

Primarily, this means “Europeanizing Germany’s European policy” – encouraging Germany to first explain itself and accommodate its neighbors and then to better coordinate with the wider world, especially democratic partners. Through our projects, such as the Action Group Zeitenwende and European Policy Study Group, we inject international perspectives into the German debate on security and the economy. Through our long-standing work on Franco-German relations, we help Paris and Berlin handle the tensions of EU widening and deepening. In our project on transatlantic relations, we ask how Europeans can navigate Washington’s Euroskepticism and Germanoskepticism, especially when it comes to defense, trade, and important foreign policy issues.

The Alfred von Oppenheim Center for the Future of Europe (AOZ) also contributes to DGAP’s broader work on global order. We look at different ways in which the European Union can organize itself internally, and how this would affect its ability to influence global affairs. Recent global tensions have fueled calls for “European autonomy” and for the EU – alongside China and the United States – to be one of a “Big Three” that defines the future of globalization. Instead, we ask how the European Union can prevent itself from becoming too top-heavy, exploring how different kinds of internal reform can unlock new international alliances that, in turn, can better secure Europe’s future, allowing it to thrive rather than merely survive.

Contact person



 

Dieser Button führt zum Schnellzugriff auf Literatur zum Thema Europäische Zukunftsfragen. Die Links sind mit der Datenbank 'World Affairs Online' verknüpft.

Publications

Willkommen auf der Weltbühne

Fußball ist ein einfaches Spiel, Integration eine komplexe Aufgabe. Im Ruhrgebiet ist der Sport seit jeher der Motor, ohne den Erfolgsgeschichten wie die von Mesut Özil oder Lira Alushi nicht möglich wären.

Author/s
Dr. Joachim Staron
IP Wirtschaft
Creation date

„Wir erleben Europa häufig unbewusst“

Interview mit Anna-Lena Rose und Markus Schneider (JEF)

Europaschulen, Europa-Studiengänge, Erasmus: Formal bietet die EU jungen Menschen im Ruhrgebiet einiges an. Doch wie kommt das bei denen an? Zwei Vertreter der Jungen Europäischen Föderalisten (JEF) im Gespräch.

IP Wirtschaft
Interview
Creation date

Der Schlüssel für Brüssel

Drei Köpfe, drei Fragen.

Wofür setzen sich EU-Abgeordnete aus dem Revier ein, und wie gehen sie dabei vor?

IP
Creation date

Events

Past events

09:30 - 11:15 | 15 Oct 2012

Europäischer Binnenmarkt als Wachstumsmotor

Podiumsdiskussion über die Potenziale des gemeinsamen Marktes zur Überwindung der Krise

Er lässt sich als Europas größter Trumpf in der Krise bezeichnen: Seit zwanzig Jahren ist der Europäische Binnenmarkt vertragliche Realität – und bietet ganz konkrete Vorteile für Unternehmen und Verbraucher. Vertreter der europäischen Institutionen, aus den Mitgliedstaaten, Unternehmen und der Wissenschaft würdigten dies und erörterten die Möglichkeiten des Binnenmarktes bei einer gemeinsamen Veranstaltung der DGAP, der Vertretung der EU-Kommission in Berlin und der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.

Veranstaltung Forschungsprogramm
Diskussion
Berlin
18:00 | 14 - 18 Oct 2012

The EU and Western Balkans in Dialogue

Policy analysts from the Western Balkans visit Brussels

The participants of the TRAIN Programme 2012 paid a four-day visit to the EU capital to present the results of their policy research on the EU integration process in the Western Balkans. They had the opportunity to discuss their work with representatives from the European Commission, the European Parliament, current and future member states, as well as Brussels-based think tanks.

Program Event
09:00 | 10 - 14 Oct 2012

Morocco and the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership

The Franco-German Future Dialogue holds a four-day seminar in Rabat

How much potential does the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership hold for Germany, France, and Morocco? Which experiences can the three countries share during the process of regionalization? How can they deal with their past? During a four-day seminar, 30 participants from Germany, France, and Morocco discussed common topics and ongoing issues for Mediterranean policy, thus opening up the Franco-German Future dialogue to the Mediterranean region.

Think Tank Event
12:00 - 14:00 | 02 Oct 2012

The United States and the International Criminal Court

Discussion with ICC judge Hans-Peter Kaul and David J. Scheffer, director of the Center for International Human Rights

In March 2012 the International Criminal Court (ICC) filed its first verdict: a 14 year prison sentence for Congolese military leader Thomas Lubanga. But even with this recent success, the ICC faces problems, most notably the fact that the United States is not a member. On the Court's tenth anniversary, David J. Scheffer and Hans-Peter Kaul took stock of where the court stands and discussed the prospects of American membership.

Program Event
Expertenrunde
11:30 - 13:00 | 25 Sep 2012

Kosovo, Serbien und die Statusfrage

Ist die Aussicht auf EU-Mitgliedschaft Anreiz genug, die Differenzen zu überwinden? Brussels Briefing mit Stefan Lehne

„Einen Ausgleich zwischen Serbien und Kosovo herbeizuführen ist nicht leicht, aber auch nicht unmöglich“, sagte Stefan Lehne, Visiting Scholar bei Carnegie Europe, beim „Brussels Briefing“ der DGAP. Neben einer substanziellen Autonomie für den Norden Kosovos könne eine Annäherung zunächst auch über eine Zusammenarbeit ohne völkerrechtliche Anerkennung führen, für die der deutsch-deutsche Grundlagenvertrag von 1972 als Vorbild dienen könne.

Veranstaltung Forschungsprogramm
Diskussion
Berlin

Further programs