Alfred von Oppenheim Center for the Future of Europe

At the Alfred von Oppenheim Center for the Future of Europe (AOZ), a small group of researchers from across Europe provide their perspectives on decision-making by the German government. The aim is twofold: to avoid misperceptions between Germany and its partners at a time of power shifts in Europe and geopolitical realignment and to help Germany help Europe to build a brighter future.

Main Topics:

  • Internationalizing the Zeitenwende, Germany’s shift in defense, energy, economic, and foreign policy in response to Russia’s war on Ukraine
  • Rethinking Franco-German efforts to reform the EU taking account of power shifts in Wider Europe
  • Analyzing European choices about defense, security, and foreign policy in light of political developments in the United States
  • Highlighting different ways for Europeans to do grand strategy and geopolitics – and to better combine values with interests
Read more

We provide an outside perspective on German decision-making and tackle misperceptions between Germany and its partners at a time of power shifts in Europe and of geopolitical realignment. By looking at German policies and policy-making from different angles, focusing on the country’s key relationships and factoring in the concerns of its neighbors and partners, we help Germany to play a positive role in constructing the future European order – and to help Europe build a brighter future.

In thinking about the future, we combine our expertise on the historical development of European alliances, institutions, and policies with methods of strategic foresight. And in thinking about European order, we look beyond the EU to include other European and transatlantic partnerships and institutions.

Applications for Our Research

Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and the EU’s strategic failures in fields such as defense, energy, and economic security have put the spotlight on German decision-making. Long Europe’s main status quo power, Germany now stands accused of a basic failure to listen to its neighbors. The country is under pressure to adapt its thinking to current geopolitical challenges and better calculate – or at least better articulate – its own interests.

We aim to help Germany become a good citizen of Europe, a “team power,” but how do we do so when the pressures Germany faces seem so contradictory? Germany needs to change its foreign policy significantly but also remain credible and predictable as a partner. It needs to assert itself in a new world order but also to build consensus with its neighbors.

Primarily, this means “Europeanizing Germany’s European policy” – encouraging Germany to first explain itself and accommodate its neighbors and then to better coordinate with the wider world, especially democratic partners. Through our projects, such as the Action Group Zeitenwende and European Policy Study Group, we inject international perspectives into the German debate on security and the economy. Through our long-standing work on Franco-German relations, we help Paris and Berlin handle the tensions of EU widening and deepening. In our project on transatlantic relations, we ask how Europeans can navigate Washington’s Euroskepticism and Germanoskepticism, especially when it comes to defense, trade, and important foreign policy issues.

The Alfred von Oppenheim Center for the Future of Europe (AOZ) also contributes to DGAP’s broader work on global order. We look at different ways in which the European Union can organize itself internally, and how this would affect its ability to influence global affairs. Recent global tensions have fueled calls for “European autonomy” and for the EU – alongside China and the United States – to be one of a “Big Three” that defines the future of globalization. Instead, we ask how the European Union can prevent itself from becoming too top-heavy, exploring how different kinds of internal reform can unlock new international alliances that, in turn, can better secure Europe’s future, allowing it to thrive rather than merely survive.

Contact person



 

Dieser Button führt zum Schnellzugriff auf Literatur zum Thema Europäische Zukunftsfragen. Die Links sind mit der Datenbank 'World Affairs Online' verknüpft.

Publications

Events

Past events

16:46 - {16}:{46} | 13 Jul 2011

Deutsch-Französischer Erfahrungsaustausch

Zweites Jahresseminar des Deutsch-französischen Zukunftsdialogs

Lässt sich das französische Parteiensystem ein Jahr vor der Präsidentschaftswahl mit der deutschen Parteienlandschaft vergleichen? Welche Debatten führen Deutschland und Frankreich im Vorfeld der anstehenden EU-Agrarreform und angesichts der Krise der europäischen Gemeinschaftswährung? Und ist in beiden Ländern gleichermaßen das Phänomen einer schwindenden Mittelschicht zu beobachten?

Veranstaltung Forschungsprogramm
15:30 - 17:00 | 07 Jul 2011

Germany, France, and the Tunisian Spring

What positions have Germany and France adopted in the light of mass demonstrations and regime change in Tunisia? What is expectated of Germany, France, and the EU by Tunisia and other Arab states during the process of transformation? These questions were discussed at the “German-French Future Dialogue” by Sami Ben Sassi, Internet activist from Tunis, Béligh Nabli, director of research at the French Council on Foreign Relations and Strategy (IRIS) in Paris, and Klemens Semtner, head of the task force on transformation partnership with Tunisia in the German Foreign Office.

Program Event
Diskussion
10:00 - 18:00 | 01 Jul 2011

After the Arab Spring

Expectations for Summer, Fall, and Winter

How will the Arab world develop after its stormy spring? This was one of the questions that Jack A. Goldstone of George Mason University, Paul Freiherr von Maltzahn, executive vice-president German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP), and Almut Möller, head of the Alfred von Oppenheim-Center for European Policy Studies at the DGAP discussed.

Council Event
18:30 - 20:00 | 29 Jun 2011

The Iran Nuclear Crisis:

Is an Acceptable Deal Possible?

Since the Iranian hostage crisis of 1979, the relationship between the United States and Iran consists mostly of mutual accusations. The US accuses Iran of pursuing a nuclear weapons program, and Iran accuses the US of trying to intervene in its internal affairs and acting out of imperialist motives. The question is: Is there a way out of this crisis? Dr. Steven Miller took on this question at a discussion group at the DGAP on transatlantic relations.

Program Event
Diskussion
18:30 - 20:00 | 29 Jun 2011

Early Bird Breakfast: German UN Ambassador Peter Wittig

The coming month will be an important time for German foreign policy as Germany prepares to take over the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) presidency in July. Looming questions exist regarding developments in Libya, Sudan, and Palestine. The UN currently has 15 active peacekeeping operations employing around 100,000 troops.

Program Event
Diskussion
16:00 - 17:30 | 23 Jun 2011

China, Power Shifts and Global Challenges

Die USA und China müssen Freunde werden. Allerdings wird China ein schwieriger Freund sein. Diese Botschaft vermittelte Dr. Banning Garrett, vom Think Tank Atlantic Council aus Washington D.C. den Teilnehmern des Gesprächskreises Transatlantische Beziehungen.

Veranstaltung Forschungsprogramm
Diskussion

Further programs