Policy Brief

Feb 03, 2016

When Parliaments Go to War

US War Powers in Comparative Perspective

President Trump has authorized airstrikes on Syria – sidestepping the 1973 War Powers Resolution and instead relying on the same broad interpretation of his constitutional powers as commander-in-chief that his predecessor used. Congress has yet to vote on the use of force in Syria, be it against Bashar al-Assad’s forces or against ISIS. DGAP visiting fellow Eric Langland argued in January 2016 that only a congressional vote can legitimize US military action in Syria. His analysis remains timely.

PDF

Share

January 2016: Unlike the German and British parliaments, the US Congress has thus far failed to bring to a vote an authorization for the use of force in Syria against ISIS. Instead, President Obama relied on a broad interpretation of his constitutional authority. Eric Langland argues that only a vote will give appropriate legitimacy to US military action in Syria, demonstrate popular support, and give Congress a critical opportunity to shape military policy.

Eric Langland was a Robert Bosch Transatlantic Fellow at the DGAP from October 2015 through January 2016 and previously served as a staff judge advocate in the US Marine Corps. He holds a juris doctor from Tulane University and a master’s degree from the London School of Economics.

Click on the box at the right to read the  article.

Bibliographic data

Langland, Eric. “When Parliaments Go to War.” February 2016.

DGAPkompakt 2 (January 2016),
6 pages.

Program

Themen & Regionen